Some people think taht human needs for farmlend, housing, and in dustry are more important than saving land for endangere animals. Do you agree.

Whit the growth lof population and their demand, mazimum of land has been used for farmland housing and indusridusries. As a srsull there is no more land or forest left for the ezistence of other crcatures. Some people thind that human needs for farmland housing and industry are mire important than saving land for endangered animals, but i don't agree with this point of view. The frist reason in taht all the creatures on the face of the carth hace the same right to exiistence. Every being has equal right to ezist in this earth. Human bing is not the sale owner of this carth. There should be plandty of forest land and waler for other animals as well. The secound reason is that for the ezistence of humans on earth the ezistence of other creatures is essontial. I say this becouse the presence of all the animals is essenteail for maintaining a proper food chain. We know the conequences if the food chain is broken. if the food chain is broken dthe ecosystem balance will be affected. for ezample consider the food chain of rat, snatre , and eagles are endangered species,. If it is hunted to a poing where it becomes eztinet ten the food chain will be broken. As a result of this the number of snake wil increase. Therfore if the endaigered animald are not protected the ezistence of human will become really difficult. In conelusion to save the endangered amimals to keep the glonal environment in balance and for the ezistence of the human being in this world, no more land and foresrs should be conuverted into rarmland housing and industry. More inportantly land should be saved for endangred animals.